Hi, Excerpts from Ville M. Vainio's message of Thu Sep 09 18:23:03 +1000 2010: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Flegg <and...@bleb.org> wrote: > > > That's why I'm proposing that the language in the spec recognises that > > MeeGo-compliant packages can have a canonical location (e.g. > > "repository X") and can depend on anything else in that repository. > > This would not be completely accurate either. A manufacturer way want > to create a special repository for packages that apps in their app > store CAN depend on, and this is not necessarily the repository that > the sold applications are downloaded from.
I don't think Andrew was attempting to disallow such special repositories, just that a central repository (run by MeeGo through the community process or whatever) *can* exist and that its use should be made a requirement to be compliant. Andrew, please correct me if I'm wrong. -- Robin Burchell http://rburchell.com _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
