Hi, On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Carsten Munk <cars...@maemo.org> wrote: > 2010/9/23 Andre Klapper <aklap...@openismus.com>: > > Am Donnerstag, den 23.09.2010, 06:26 -0700 schrieb Michael Leibowitz: > >> What are all these NB# bugs. I can't see them. I don't see any BMC#'s. > >> Does this release only fix bugs that I can't see and don't know about? > > > > NB is Nokia's internal non-public bugtracker. > > > > Next question is why this is the only bugtracker mentioned in > changelog for lib'meego'touch? Aren't bugs for projects part of the > MeeGo project supposed to be in bugs.meego.com?
This was precisely my line of thought, and the reason behind my filing http://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4900 (complete with some interesting statistics of the time). It's a bit sad, in a way, that after all these years, we're still not over the Maemo hurdles (https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630) - as pointed out recently by: http://yerga.wordpress.com/2010/09/11/nb666-my-eyes-hurt-about-nokia-internal-bugtracker/ On the bright side, since I filed that report, there has been some marginal improvement in that there are occasionally MeeGo bugs in the changelogs, but I'd still not call it a good situation - especially given that the report itself has basically been ignored by those it concerns, as far as I can tell. I think, at the end of the day, it boils down to a key point: Is this an openly developed project, or a Nokia project? I don't think it's too much to ask that bugs without commercially sensitive information be filed on the public bugtracker specifically for that project, so that developers - both with different affiliations (i.e. Intel) and independent developers can try test/fix/generally help out. > > Best regards, > Carsten Munk -- Robin Burchell http://rburchell.com _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
