On Mo, 2010-11-08 at 12:01 +0000, Sivan Greenberg wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Part of the discussion in Munich OVI sprint we in the PIM team > concluded that we'd like to achieve the following for better > integration with either the KDE desktop/ MeeGo: > 1) OVI to officially support SyncEvolution, e.g. be fully compatible > with SyncEvolution through its usage of SyncML. > 2) Create a reference pure qt UI for either the desktop and mobile platforms. > > Now according to this group of threads on the ML, it seems that > there's already collaboration going on between SyncEvolution team and > Nokia / Intel. > > We'd like to know what's the status of this, in order to not duplicate > efforts, or preferably re-use mobile version of qt ui for > SyncEvolution for KDE, if a such already exists.
Nokia and Intel replaced SyncEvolution in MeeGo with Buteo. Since then, any kind of Ovi.com<->KDE or Ovi.com<->Evolution interoperability work has to be done in spare time activities. Nightly Ovi.com<->Evolution tests still run, but I haven't looked into the results for a while. I myself don't have the time for that, so the project has to rely on other interested developers doing that kind of work. What I'm committed to is doing the necessary code reviews and releases to get suitable code into the hands of users. The question of Ovi.com<->MeeGo interoperability is something completely separate from that. It is done inside Nokia and I don't know much about it. Sateesh should be able to tell you more. My interest is more from an architectural point of view: if tweaks to a shared file in /etc/sync are necessary, how can we get those into MeeGo Core? -- Best Regards Patrick Ohly Senior Software Engineer Intel GmbH Open Source Technology Center Pützstr. 5 Phone: +49-228-2493652 53129 Bonn Germany _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
