Hi Arjen, On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 17:30, Arjan van de Ven <ar...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> I wouldn't have thought there was, but obviously the statement above from >> Arjan van de Ven concerned me. > > my concern is based on the (lack of) progress around QSparql in MeeGo. I'm > sure it's all great in Harmattan, > but a solid story for MeeGo has so far been lacking. Ideally QSparql becomes > a real, full and open source member of the Qt family of APIs. > (a solid story also includes proper moving away from older APIs) Where exactly your concerns are coming from?
http://maemo.gitorious.org/maemo-af/qsparql and http://maemo.gitorious.org/maemo-af/libqtsparql-tracker are alive and available. Development there hapens daily. Developers are available at upstream tracker IRC channel. The code there exactly what is used in Harmattan, packages get built straight out of gitorious.org. Are you concerned that nobody has submitted libqtsparql-tracker for about three months to OBS? QSparql build itself as over a month old. I guess an "architecture decision" story hasn't really added any assurance at all. > Until that's there.... color me a bit skeptical... it's been promised for a > long time and hasn't really materialized very well yet. Code is there open, development is happening openly, and for what it worth, it gets very extensive testing as part of Harmattan application development. Don't tell me that at this level (Tracker <-> QSparql) testing in MeeGo would be totally different from any other recent GNU/Linux environment. Regarding "proper moving away from older APIs", meego-handset-photos hasn't seen any development in gitorious.org since October2010. Where can I find a recent version? -- / Alexander Bokovoy _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
