On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 14:20 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > The last time I looked at QSparql, admittedly several months ago, it > didn't strike me as a particularly modern C++ API. For example, it had > lots of plain pointers where I would expect light-weight handles > instead.
Please continue your review on the other parts of Qt, you might be in for a surprise. regards, Michael _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
