> Wednesday, July 13, 2011 1:09 PM > ext-iekku.huttu...@nokia.com wrote: > > Hi Shane, > > And thanks for your comments. I was counting on you ;) > > I will keep Connie as a default assignee for the libseaside. > > > >> About the current bugs: > >> - All NOT ARM related bugs are going to be directly WONTFIX, > cause no > >official support / maintenance currently for IA. > >> > > > >This is the only item I take some issue with. There is know way for you, or > >anyone else, to know if there is or is not still any device that is IA based > >still > >being worked on, or tested against. And, even though there may not appear > >to be a "official support"-ed IA device, the nice thing about IA devices are > >that > >they are often quite similar to each other, so any current IA bug will most > >certainly still "apply" to any future IA device. > > > >So, I kindly request that you do not take the above action, or only do so on > >those components that do end up being identified as unmaintained and > >unused in N900 CE. > > > >Or, mark them as needing review somehow, and add a comment to them as > >such, triggering those that do still have a maintainer (like dialer) to take > >action > >to review them themselves. > > > The IA bugs has been agreed to mark as WONTFIX in the QA-meeting. After I > have done the basic changes Fan Zhao takes care of the the IA part. Adding Fan > as a cc to get her opinion also for this. I understand your point very well > and it's > good that you started the conversation. Would it be the best way to add new > keyword to identify the bugs? Something like "maintainer_needed"?
As I said a few weeks ago in QA meeting, I would prefer to search out the detailed relevant bugs and get developers reviewed before taking actions on them (http://irclogs.meego.com/meetbot/meego-meeting/2011/meego-meeting.2011-06-14-06.58.log.html) > > Br, > Iekku _______________________________________________ MeeGo-handset mailing list MeeGo-handset@lists.meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-handset
