sorry my fault, i sorta strayed from the topic of the thread :)
Terry wrote:
> Zac,
> You're correct about the CA18, but I thought there was a limit to 1600cc to
> this thread or am I confused with another topic? cause I've written some
> stuff earlier with 1600cc in mind but if there wasn't a limit I'd have said
> it differently.
>
> Terry (it's raining again)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Zac Campbell
> Sent: Saturday, 11 November 2000 5:52 PM
> To: Ozdat
> Subject: Re: ca16 conversion/adam/list
>
> CA20 is a dizzy type ignition isn't it?
> Stock computer might have trouble there.
> Plus rebuilding a CA20 doesn't sound too appealing. The CA18 config sounds
> so much nicer - the bore/stroke numbers, dohc, stronger pistons, all that
> straight off the shelf without having to open it up. just makes more sense
> to me!
>
> zac
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Julian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 4:10 PM
> Subject: Re: ca16 conversion/adam/list
>
> > Speaking about CA series engines.. here are some specs for the 2.0E
> (pintara)
> > and 1.8DET (s13)
> >
> > CA18 CA20
> >
> > 1809cc 1974cc
> > bore x stroke 83.0 x 83.6 84.5 x 88.0
> > Valve arrangement DOHC OHC
> > Firing Order 1-3-4-2 1-3-4-2
> > # compression rings: 2 2
> > # oil rings: 1 1
> > # main bearings: 5 5
> > CR: 8.5 8.5
> >
> > Rod centre distance 132.95-133.05 149.25-149.35
> >
> >
> >
> > Anyone have specs on the CA16?
> >
> > With the CA20 have an 8.5 compression ratio, pistons in the CA18 would be
> > stronger to handle greater compression on boost? Im thinking find a
> > turbo+manifold from CA18, stick it in your pintara, run std boost and
> computer
> > and hope it doesn't ping...
> >
> > Maybe later when you are rebuilding your 2lt CA to turbo specs add a DOHC
> > head...
> >
> > Did the CA20 only come in the Pintara?
> >
> > Got the rest of the specs but dont' understand most of it :)
> >
> > - Julian
> >
> >
> > justin darragh wrote:
> >
> > > Ozdatters,
> > > thanx for the reply. I want to keep it nissan as all these are Toyotas.
> Adam
> > > explain your idea... how the who the what about CA18? I need a 1600 twin
> cam
> > > rwd.
> > > What is the lists view on just working the L16? Which will give better
> > > results? I really need the twin cams though!
> > > Are there any other 1600 options?
> > > Thanx
> > > Justin
> > >
> _________________________________________________________________________
> > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
> http://www.hotmail.com.
> > >
> > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> > > http://profiles.msn.com.
> > >
> >
> >
>
--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
