Hey, To all three of you: Just run it anywhere you can (but not more than one machine, yet?), with the options prescribed in the PR. Ideally you have graphs of the hit ratio and maybe cache fullness and can compare before/after.
And let me know if it hangs or crashes, obviously. If so a backtrace and/or coredump would be fantastic. On Thu, 8 Jan 2015, Zhiwei Chan wrote: > I will deploy it to one of our test environment on CentOS 5.8, for a > comparison test with the 1.4.21, although the workloads is not as heavy as > product environment. Tell me if any I could help. > > 2015-01-07 23:30 GMT+08:00 Eric McConville <erichasem...@gmail.com>: > Same here. Do you want any findings posted to the mailing list, or the > PU thread? > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Ryan McCullagh <m...@ryanmccullagh.com> wrote: > I'm willing to help out in any way possible. What can I do? > > -----Original Message----- > From: memcached@googlegroups.com [mailto:memcached@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf Of dormando > Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2015 3:52 AM > To: memcached@googlegroups.com > Subject: memory efficiency / LRU refactor branch > > Yo, > > https://github.com/memcached/memcached/pull/97 > > Opening to a wider audience. I need some folks willing to poke at it > and see > if their workloads fair better or worse with respect to hit ratios. > > The rest of the work remaining on my end is more testing, and some > TODO's > noted in the PR. The remaining work is relatively small aside from the > page > mover idea. It hasn't been crashing or hanging in my testing so far, but > that might still happen. > > I can't/won't merge this until I get some evidence that it's useful. > Hoping someone out there can lend a hand. I don't know what the actual > impact would be, but for some workloads it could be large. Even for > folks > who have set all items to never expire, it could still potentially > improve > hit ratios by better protecting active items. > > It will work best if you at least have a mix of items with TTL's that > expire > in reasonable amounts of time. > > thanks, > -Dormando > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "memcached" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "memcached" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "memcached" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > >
