To be extra clear; you can send feeback here or the PR. I don't care either way.
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015, dormando wrote: > Hey, > > To all three of you: Just run it anywhere you can (but not more than one > machine, yet?), with the options prescribed in the PR. Ideally you have > graphs of the hit ratio and maybe cache fullness and can compare > before/after. > > And let me know if it hangs or crashes, obviously. If so a backtrace > and/or coredump would be fantastic. > > On Thu, 8 Jan 2015, Zhiwei Chan wrote: > > > I will deploy it to one of our test environment on CentOS 5.8, for a > > comparison test with the 1.4.21, although the workloads is not as heavy as > > product environment. Tell me if any I could help. > > > > 2015-01-07 23:30 GMT+08:00 Eric McConville <erichasem...@gmail.com>: > > Same here. Do you want any findings posted to the mailing list, or > > the PU thread? > > > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Ryan McCullagh <m...@ryanmccullagh.com> > > wrote: > > I'm willing to help out in any way possible. What can I do? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: memcached@googlegroups.com [mailto:memcached@googlegroups.com] > > On > > Behalf Of dormando > > Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2015 3:52 AM > > To: memcached@googlegroups.com > > Subject: memory efficiency / LRU refactor branch > > > > Yo, > > > > https://github.com/memcached/memcached/pull/97 > > > > Opening to a wider audience. I need some folks willing to poke at it > > and see > > if their workloads fair better or worse with respect to hit ratios. > > > > The rest of the work remaining on my end is more testing, and some > > TODO's > > noted in the PR. The remaining work is relatively small aside from > > the page > > mover idea. It hasn't been crashing or hanging in my testing so far, > > but > > that might still happen. > > > > I can't/won't merge this until I get some evidence that it's useful. > > Hoping someone out there can lend a hand. I don't know what the actual > > impact would be, but for some workloads it could be large. Even for > > folks > > who have set all items to never expire, it could still potentially > > improve > > hit ratios by better protecting active items. > > > > It will work best if you at least have a mix of items with TTL's that > > expire > > in reasonable amounts of time. > > > > thanks, > > -Dormando > > > > -- > > > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "memcached" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > > > -- > > > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "memcached" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > > > -- > > > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "memcached" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > >
