Hi, I agree with your opinions!
We test the "tag-function" for a long time, and there are two patch files on the web site (one for memcached, one for module). Can you merge they into the main project, please? Robert Q. Liu _____ 发件人: Chris Goffinet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 发送时间: 2008年2月13日 11:40 收件人: Dustin Sallings 抄送: Robert Q. Liu; <[email protected]> 主题: Re: Tag Function Dustin: Thought the same thing. Was a bit off. At least there is a diff on the site :) -- Chris Goffinet MyBlogLog Engineer Yahoo! San Francisco, CA United States On Feb 12, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Dustin Sallings wrote: I'm sure we all appreciate the effort, but I don't think it was necessary to create a formal fork of the project to do so. Is there something about your implementation that you feel makes it unsuitable to be merged into the main project? -- Dustin Sallings (mobile) On Feb 12, 2008, at 19:15, "Robert Q. Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, all: We add "Tag Function" for memcached. Propose is remove several keys with the same tag in one operation. We use hash and splay tree, make the "tag_add" and "tag_delete" commands very quickly, and save memory as much as possible. New memcached command: tag_add <tag> <key>* tag_delete <tag> More detail: <http://code.google.com/p/memcached-tag/> http://code.google.com/p/memcached-tag/ If you find BUGS, please tell us, thanks very much. Have Fun! Robert Q. Liu
