like the author has noted, that patch is currently for memcached 1.2.4 only. there're lots of diff between 1.2.4 and thunk(e.g. binary_protocol) i think.
2008/3/20 André Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hello. > > It looks like the patch was never applied to the main trunk. > Is it unstable? What work remains to be done? > > Best regards, > André Cruz > > > > On 2008/02/13, at 07:40, Robert Q. Liu wrote: > > > Hi, > I agree with your opinions! > We test the "tag-function" for a long time, and there are two patch files on > the web site (one for memcached, one for module). > Can you merge they into the main project, please? > > Robert Q. Liu > > ________________________________ > > 发件人: Chris Goffinet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > 发送时间: 2008年2月13日 11:40 > 收件人: Dustin Sallings > 抄送: Robert Q. Liu; <[email protected]> > 主题: Re: Tag Function > > Dustin: > > Thought the same thing. Was a bit off. At least there is a diff on the site > :) > > > > -- > Chris Goffinet > MyBlogLog Engineer > Yahoo! > San Francisco, CA > United States > > > On Feb 12, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Dustin Sallings wrote: > > > > > I'm sure we all appreciate the effort, but I don't think it was necessary > to create a formal fork of the project to do so. > > Is there something about your implementation that you feel makes it > unsuitable to be merged into the main project? > > -- > Dustin Sallings (mobile) > > On Feb 12, 2008, at 19:15, "Robert Q. Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, all: > > We add "Tag Function" for memcached. Propose is remove several keys with > the same tag in one operation. We use hash and splay tree, make the > "tag_add" and "tag_delete" commands very quickly, and save memory as much as > possible. > > New memcached command: > tag_add <tag> <key>* > tag_delete <tag> > > More detail: > http://code.google.com/p/memcached-tag/ > > If you find BUGS, please tell us, thanks very much. > > Have Fun! > Robert Q. Liu > > > -- Regards, Du Song
