Hello.
It looks like the patch was never applied to the main trunk.
Is it unstable? What work remains to be done?
Best regards,
André Cruz
On 2008/02/13, at 07:40, Robert Q. Liu wrote:
Hi,
I agree with your opinions!
We test the "tag-function" for a long time, and there are two patch
files on the web site (one for memcached, one for module).
Can you merge they into the main project, please?
Robert Q. Liu
发件人: Chris Goffinet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
发送时间: 2008年2月13日 11:40
收件人: Dustin Sallings
抄送: Robert Q. Liu; <[email protected]>
主题: Re: Tag Function
Dustin:
Thought the same thing. Was a bit off. At least there is a diff on
the site :)
--
Chris Goffinet
MyBlogLog Engineer
Yahoo!
San Francisco, CA
United States
On Feb 12, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Dustin Sallings wrote:
I'm sure we all appreciate the effort, but I don't think it was
necessary to create a formal fork of the project to do so.
Is there something about your implementation that you feel makes
it unsuitable to be merged into the main project?
--
Dustin Sallings (mobile)
On Feb 12, 2008, at 19:15, "Robert Q. Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi, all:
We add "Tag Function" for memcached. Propose is remove several
keys with the same tag in one operation. We use hash and splay
tree, make the "tag_add" and "tag_delete" commands very quickly,
and save memory as much as possible.
New memcached command:
tag_add <tag> <key>*
tag_delete <tag>
More detail:
http://code.google.com/p/memcached-tag/
If you find BUGS, please tell us, thanks very much.
Have Fun!
Robert Q. Liu
