Yes...I agree that THAT is a claim...that "god does not exist". However, I do not make that claim. I do not need to do such a thing. So, with that said, the onus is on the claimant. Now, if you are the one who said that god exist and I said that you are wrong, "god does not exist"...you still have to back up that original claim...the onus is still on you. I can say that in response to your original claim without having to prove or provide evidence or an objective standard to establish such a claim. My response is in retort to your claim. I have to prove nothing. The claim that there is a god is not innate. It was thought up. Even if it is to be real...prove it. The onus is still on the original claimant.
I think I am clear on this but if not bear with me...alot of stuff to explain. Wait, is the "onus" on me now....? Hmmmmmm? I sound like Micheal. (No offense Mike...just joshing.) stemcell On Sep 10, 11:33 pm, Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <<I say that too. God does not exist. >> > > Then that is a claim, not the absence of a claim. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
