Orn. I am not clear. Who are you and what are you putting foreward? > Even if one posits that the moment of conception > is when the "consciousness" (soul) enters the body one must then > realize that it is a scientific question.
"First I'll agree when science has the tools to address soul or other such notions." I like your thoughts....somewhat. I am not arguing, nor will I get into argument about, that science has further to go to reach a science of the soul.. Zeus does not throw lighting bolts. It is non- existent....like Zeus...god...reincarnation, etc. When I said that it is a science question, I was referring to the science of development. In other words, Zeus does not throw lighting bolts. On Sep 22, 5:34 pm, ornamentalmind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh, you are not interested in such imaginary things as the > 'irrational', are you? (…other than as a means to hone debate > techniques.) If I misread you, please advise. > In general, I don't discuss things that specific people reject with > them. An analogy would be to attempt a serious debate with a > fundamentalist Christian about the true age of the earth. Most times > the result is just further entrenchment into an already crystalized > belief system. > > On Sep 22, 3:28 pm, Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > <<Yes, these are all common memes of the day and no new news at all. > > > And dodges a defense of the irrationality. (as usual)- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
