Jason and Taylor both asked if this study also applies to our
interactions with religious people.  I think it is an important
question - one we should probably think about more often.  Jason's
strategies are a good place to start.

Aaron


On Sep 24, 12:31 pm, "Jason (Memphis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I think that part of this discussion may be "tribalism" that we
> frequently talked about:
>
> 1.  When dis-confirmation of a statement or information occurs against
> a tribal stance, this dis-confirmation is treated as an attack on the
> tribe.
>
> 2.  Who stated the dis-confirmation is important.  If a follow tribal
> member makes a statement inconsistent with the tribal stance, other
> tribal members will determine if that tribe member is a trader to the
> tribal stance or just a tribal member who is honestly correcting the
> tribal stance.  The reaction of the tribe to the dissenter is very
> important in this evaluation, that is, an allegiance to tribal
> authority is important so the reaction of the leader of the tribe hold
> weight on the tribe members' decision.
>
> 3.  People outside the tribe are not to be trust and are the enemies.
> If these outsiders make a stance against a tribal stance, their
> statement should be attacked until the tribe (and especially its
> leaders) shifts their stance.
>
> 4.  Often the conversations are not based on the soundness of the
> argument or using the events as the criteria for a good stance but
> rather the conformity of the stance with the tribal stance hold a lot
> of weight.
>
> That is just my impression from arguing with Christians in the South
> over the past few years.
>
> Strategies...just some ideas:
>
> 1.  Get them to identify with other tribes.
> 2.  Get them to identify with you.
> 3.  Once the emotional tribal identification is weakened, expose them
> to other ways of looking at the same questions or analysis of the
> information.
> 4.  Repeat the same dis-confirming message in different ways.
> 5.  Teach them different ways of evaluating the information (critical
> thinking).
> 6.  Meet with the tribal members that promote that information to
> understand and respond to their stance.
> 7.  Talk to the tribal leaders.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Memphis Freethought Alliance" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to