OOOPS!!! Think that should be: http://niggerwise.com
I just have to get the rights to "puppylikeme.com"!!! HeHeHe. On Nov 8, 6:22 am, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isparklaria, watch for this one: > > One of the site sculptures related to QBL in progress right now is > quite exciting. That young adept I mentioned, who shows so much > promise, attempted something similar but very simple. His name is John > Logan and, while very learned, he didn’t have the artistic skill or > resources to take it as far as it can be. What it consists of are > renditions of the projected tree, with all paths and sepheroth having > hyperlinks leading to the correspondences one develops in a “key”, > like “777”. It will tie together content from alchemy and other > comparative studies to QBL. Rather than having just a scholastic > appeal, it is turning out visually quite stunning. Bits and pieces of > it will begin appearing on NIGGERWISE immediately. This is just to > verify how things are looking online. Come spring it will all tie > together, into a complex puzzle of sorts, accessible from TIER THREE > of THE GAME. > > http://niggerwise.come > > On Nov 8, 3:36 am, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Don't sweat claims. I will soon verify all claims but more than claims > > are our verification. Your poetry shows one very important factor. You > > consider these things right hemisphere dominant, rather than > > desperately seeking one more faith to cling to. At least you are > > knocking on the right door. > > > It is easier for some. It is only knowing precisely where to apply the > > wedge and precisely how to apply the blow to shear the stone. > > > All we desire is to recreate that music of the spheres: > > > Infinitely smaller to infinitely vaster; Subatomic, atomic, molecular, > > body, species, planet, sun, stars, galaxies, universe; all are > > infinite points within infinite spirals ~ all forming a greater point > > in a moment of infinite time on a greater spiral beyond comprehension > > or limit. > > > There is no end in the journey. There is no completed circle. Just > > infinite spiralling movement. That is the beauty in the music of the > > spheres. > > > IT IS ART WE SEEK! > > >http://niggerwise.com > > > On Nov 7, 7:38 pm, Isparklaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Nov 7, 6:11 pm, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > That said, I do have a challenge. If you understand it all that well, > > > > are you independent? Do all things come easy? Is wealth yours enough > > > > to create it for others? > > > > One of the reason that I am intersted in what you have been saying is > > > that you have made some claims about yourself that sound enticing. I > > > suppose (perhaps wrongly) that you would answer the above in the > > > afirmative. Now I have no way of knowing whether or not your claims > > > are true, but at the very least you seem like an intelligent and > > > intense person. It has also cost me nothing but a little but of time > > > to interact with you. I am planning to continue to check out your > > > growing web site. > > > > On Nov 7, 6:11 pm, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > That said, I do have a challenge. If you understand it all that well, > > > > are you independent? Do all things come easy? Is wealth yours enough > > > > to create it for others? If not, question how deep your understanding. > > > > It is about things that make us more effective. Success in it has > > > > obvious symptoms. And don’t fall back on that old wheeze of you don’t > > > > need all that much. Those who are steward of self are steward in the > > > > world and the world does need all that much. > > > > >http://niggerwise.com > > > > > On Nov 7, 6:02 pm, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > It is not a contest, dear. I have no intention of showing you any > > > > > reason to believe or feel anything at all. I don't struggle to > > > > > understand this particular subject matter. I work it. I use it daily. > > > > > Now, I do enjoy talking about it. Most especially with those who use > > > > > it on the level that I do, and even more with those who apply it in > > > > > the arts. None of it is about redeeming souls or making a better > > > > > world. It is more about mastering engraving and metallurgy. It is far > > > > > more about properly shearing a gem stone. It is more about stimulating > > > > > mind through art. I don’t really give a damn about all the New Age > > > > > take on it. Man nor the world is intended to be perfected but we can > > > > > strive to do perfect creations. > > > > > >http://niggerwise.com > > > > > > On Nov 7, 4:58 pm, Isparklaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Nov 7, 12:05 pm, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > It also appears > > > > > > > > from the frequency of variations of the word "belief" that it is > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > dulling faith you seek. > > > > > > > I use the word belief in a similar way to how you have used > > > > > > "appears" > > > > > > in the above sentence. My purpose is to let you know that I know > > > > > > that > > > > > > I am not certain, but have reason to think something is true. I am > > > > > > more than willing to examine evidence that I have not seen which > > > > > > might > > > > > > change my beliefs. That is the main reason that I have been writing > > > > > > to > > > > > > you. So far you have perked my interest but I also feel that you > > > > > > have > > > > > > not shown me any reason to believe that you have a significantly > > > > > > deeper understanding of these subjects that I have. I am still open > > > > > > to > > > > > > changing my mind or even just having some fun talking about these > > > > > > subjects that both "skeptics" and religionist find unbearable. > > > > > > > On Nov 7, 12:05 pm, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > There is no stoicism nor humility called for in kabbalah. There is > > > > > > > that element in faiths that include kabbalah. That is like saying > > > > > > > English or Latin requires humility. It is a pattern in faith that > > > > > > > undo > > > > > > > significance is given some element of the experience of thinking. > > > > > > > Those sources you refer to are distortions of faith. It also > > > > > > > appears > > > > > > > from the frequency of variations of the word "belief" that it is > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > dulling faith you seek. I would recommend a narcotic over faith. > > > > > > > > Transcendent states exclude ego. Escher in prolonged attention to > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > act of etching looses sense of self and experiences transcendent > > > > > > > concepts. The same thing happens in many such endeavors that > > > > > > > require > > > > > > > prolonged and intense attention. QBL requires prolonged and > > > > > > > intense > > > > > > > attention. What is inevitable is not a requirement. > > > > > > > > To win at chess lose yourself in the game. Is it a requirement > > > > > > > because > > > > > > > worded that way? Or is it inevitable in the process of winning? > > > > > > > >http://niggerwise.com > > > > > > > > On Nov 7, 10:08 am, Isparklaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Nov 7, 2:28 am, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Isparklaria, YOU NEED HELP! > > > > > > > > > BBDD, if you really have all of the experience with QBL that you > > > > > > > > claim, then I could use your help, if I decide to pursue that > > > > > > > > study. > > > > > > > > In that case, I would actually be grateful for any help you > > > > > > > > could > > > > > > > > give me. > > > > > > > > > On Nov 7, 2:28 am, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > All your notions on this subject are extremely flawed! No, > > > > > > > > there is no > > > > > > > > > > demand for stoicism in kabbalah. None at all. > > > > > > > > > QBL and other more recent takes on Kabbalah may not require > > > > > > > > stoicism; > > > > > > > > I don’t know much about QBL; my only knowledge of QBL comes > > > > > > > > from books > > > > > > > > and a little bit of dabbling with some ideas found in them. On > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > other hand the old literature on Kabbalah makes it clear that > > > > > > > > practicing Kabbalistic meditation without first transforming > > > > > > > > ones > > > > > > > > personality so that one is stoic will likely lead to big > > > > > > > > problems. It > > > > > > > > is possible that the methods of QBL have changed enough from > > > > > > > > Kabbalah > > > > > > > > so that this is no longer necessary to be stoic. > > > > > > > > > This is from on link that back up what I say about stoicism and > > > > > > > > Kabbalah:http://www.cs.utah.edu/~spiegel/kabbalah/jkm07.htm > > > > > > > > 7.21 Humility > > > > > > > > One must obtain the level of humility before being able to > > > > > > > > experience > > > > > > > > authentic kabbalah. And what is humility? This is none other > > > > > > > > then to > > > > > > > > be stoic, to be indifferent to one who complements as one who > > > > > > > > insults. > > > > > > > > [629] Bittul – nullify means humility in Hebrew. > > > > > > > > > There are many books and web pages that also say that stoicism > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > needed. I believe them not because they are merely from what > > > > > > > > seems top > > > > > > > > be a good authority (and I have heard this advice from people > > > > > > > > who I > > > > > > > > also believe were knew what they were talking about), but I > > > > > > > > believe > > > > > > > > this because it seems reasonable. I know from even low-level > > > > > > > > meditation that one can have problems if one is easily > > > > > > > > influenced by > > > > > > > > these experiences. Stoicism is necessary to keep things in > > > > > > > > perspective. > > > > > > > > > I am very busy today, so I might not get back to you until much > > > > > > > > later > > > > > > > > this evening. I see that you wrote some things about Thelema, > > > > > > > > but I > > > > > > > > have not yet read them. I am planning to read them later. At > > > > > > > > that time > > > > > > > > I may also respond. > > > > > > > > > On Nov 7, 2:28 am, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Isparklaria, YOU NEED HELP! > > > > > > > > > > All your notions on this subject are extremely flawed! No, > > > > > > > > > there is no > > > > > > > > > demand for stoicism in kabbalah. None at all. There is no > > > > > > > > > demand for > > > > > > > > > anything. There is a path for success. No, stoicism is not an > > > > > > > > > element > > > > > > > > > of that. You are confusing different systems of Western > > > > > > > > > esoteric > > > > > > > > > initiation. > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
