<<I would say that apropriate rationalism is sartionalism that seems to serve a useful function, such as play, humor, art, love and much much more. >>
I suppose you meant "irrationalism" rather than "rationalism", and I don't know what "sartionalism" means. Anyway, I don't regard those things you mentioned as irrational. Seeking out out things that make us feel good is very rational. On Nov 19, 5:16 pm, Isparklaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 19, 4:09 pm, Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > <<How do I tell the difference between inappropriate irrationalism and > > appropriate irrationalism?>> > > > Easy. That would be irrationalism that lsparklaria agrees with. :-) > > I like your definition. Now if only I could everyone else to buy it as > being the objective standard on everything. Wait a minute, that might > make for a boring world. > > On a more serious note, I would say that apropriate rationalism is > sartionalism that seems to serve a useful function, such as play, > humor, art, love and much much more. > > On Nov 19, 4:09 pm, Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > <<How do I tell the difference between inappropriate irrationalism and > > appropriate irrationalism?>> > > > Easy. That would be irrationalism that lsparklaria agrees with. :-) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
