On Nov 19, 4:09 pm, Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <<How do I tell the difference between inappropriate irrationalism and > appropriate irrationalism?>> > Easy. That would be irrationalism that lsparklaria agrees with. :-) I like your definition Taylor. Now if only I could get everyone else to buy it as being the objective standard on everything. Wait a minute, that might make for a boring world. On a more serious note, I would say that appropriate irrationalism is irrationalism that seems to serve a useful function, such as play, humor, art, love and much much more On Nov 19, 4:09 pm, Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <<How do I tell the difference between inappropriate irrationalism and > appropriate irrationalism?>> > > Easy. That would be irrationalism that lsparklaria agrees with. :-) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
