<<And why are they not profitable?>> Because expenses exceed revenues?
<<Do you believe that being able to set prices is the only thing that affects a company being profitable?>> Certainly not, but it is **a** way. <<My last post had to do with news agencies. >> Which is why I ignored it, since we were discussing auto companies. :-) <<Murdock can and does set his rates.>> No doubt, but then newspapers are not a market unto themselves. They compete with TV, radio, magazines, and the internet. The revenues have been declining for decades. In most markets, there is simply no demand for more than one newspaper, and that has nothing to do with anti-competitive practices. But I would prefer to not see our communications concentrated for other than financial considerations. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
