"...What makes people charismatic makes me curious:)" - CB

Of course, pedestals are made to tare down….feet of clay and all that…
Other than being a bit verbose, using rhetorical ‘tricks’ to make
points and his apparent lack of interest in metaphysics, I enjoy the
theater of Noam…as well as the afterglow …when it comes to thinking
that is.

Yes, charisma is a puzzle, isn’t it? Well, in fact, it is one aspect
of our psycho-physical aspect. But, that of course is a different
story.
 (I still vomit at the thought of Rand!)

On Nov 26, 7:01 am, CrossBow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you used one of my favorite words*...pseusoscientificbullshit!*  Whew!
>
> Oh, just the fact that these two characters are the kind that inspire blind
> followers who put them on a pedestal (deseved or undeserved)...that was not
> aimed at anyone on this board:)  Obviously I have no formal training in
> psychology and I find influential people like Rand and Chomsky endlessly
> facinating and seek to understand them better.  What makes people
> charismatic makes me curious:)
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:42 PM, ornamentalmind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Okay, rip my liver out but Noam's entourage reminds me of Ann
> > Rand's...bit
> > of a parade of pedestals.." - CB
>
> > I know this wasn't directed to me, but I am not clear about what you
> > are saying. ...parade of pedestals??? ...entourage??? I don't know
> > about his 'entourage', please clarify. Oh, I do know Ayn's though. I
> > even joined a study group in the early 80s to discuss her books. In a
> > word, pseudosciencebullshit. : - )
>
> > On Nov 25, 10:57 am, CrossBow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Okay, rip my liver out but Noam's entourage reminds me of Ann
> > Rand's...bit
> > > of a parade of pedestals..
>
> > > OUCH!..that hurt in advance!
>
> > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Jason (Memphis) <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > I think that Noam (my impression) believes that handing people a
> > > > science of human behavior that is essentially a handbook for
> > > > predicting and controlling people is sort of like handing nuclear
> > > > weapons to a terrorist group.  Therefore, only the elite few (my
> > > > impression) should be privy to those techniques and that scientific
> > > > discipline as that scientific discipline of human behavior unfolds.
> > > > In addition, any attempt to develop such a scientific discipline
> > > > should be thwarted  but it's development is evitable (again, my
> > > > impression of Noam).  I don't know if that is even close but just my
> > > > initial impression from what little that I have read of his works.
>
> > > > On Nov 25, 12:10 pm, "Jason (Memphis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >  > ornamentalmind,
>
> > > > > I think that my major criticism of Noam Chomsky is his lack of
> > > > > scientific thinking especially making predictions or controlling
> > > > > organisms.  Most of what I've read are historical interpretations of
> > > > > established facts and descriptions of something that has already
> > > > > happened.  He definitely has his facts in order.  However, Noam
> > seldom
> > > > > attempts to make specific predictions of societal drifts that could
> > be
> > > > > verified--or at least he is not any better at predicting than other
> > > > > historical experts.  In addition, many of his followers do not
> > > > > challenge what he says and most of what he says is said in such a way
> > > > > that makes it hard to challenge (or test).  Framing has been studied
> > > > > extensively and the master of framing is Noam Chomsky himself.
>
> > > > > A particular (this is just one) criticism is that he wrote a review
> > of
> > > > > B.F. Skinner's "Verbal Behavior" (link below) and presented arguments
> > > > > against Skinner that Skinner never claimed.  I included Noam's case
> > > > > against Skinner and a response by a behaviorist.  Chomsky also
> > accused
> > > > > Skinner of advancing totalitarianism (much the same as Noam--directly
> > > > > or indirectly--is accusing Obama).  Yes, Skinner does advocate a
> > > > > science of the behavior of organisms, which would embrace, explore,
> > > > > refine and advance a scientific discipline to predict and control
> > > > > organisms with scientific precision (including humans).  That is what
> > > > > Chomsky seems to fear (as do others including Skinner).  The concept
> > > > > of "freedom" or "free will" or the idea that humans are above the
> > laws
> > > > > of nature and therefore immune to scientific prediction and control
> > is
> > > > > a Western religion and Chomsky is sort of the Priest.  At the end of
> > > > > Skinner's "Science and Human Behavior," Skinner warned people that
> > one
> > > > > why to defend against the abuses of a science of human behavior is
> > for
> > > > > the masses to learn about how that science works and those scientific
> > > > > techniques employed.  Politicans and government have been working on
> > a
> > > > > science of human behavior for years (akin to Asimov's psycho-
> > > > > history).  The problem with Skinner is his ideal that such a
> > > > > discipline should be transparent and open to the public and entire
> > > > > scientific community.
>
> > > > > By the way, Chomsky (from the little I've read) is a fun read, and
> > > > > he's a linguistic master.
>
> > > > > A Review of B.F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior (1959) by Noam Chomsky
>
> > > > >http://cogprints.org/1148/0/chomsky.htm
>
> > > > > On Chomsky's Review of Skinner's Verbal Behavior (Journal of the
> > > > > Experimental Analysis of Behavior, volume 13, pages 83–99)
>
> >http://seab.envmed.rochester.edu/abstracts/jeababstracts/13/%2013-083...
>
> > > > > Jason
>
> > > --
> > > gnothe se auton- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> gnothe se auton- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Memphis Freethought Alliance" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to