I agree, improving quality of life for those living is paramount. I have
read that they had predicted in the past that the world would never sustain
today's population.

On 10/25/05, BillR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:50:43 -0700
> From: "Gabriel S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] population
> To: Mercedes mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Everyone in this world could be as happy as a Catholic Bishop on a
> deserted
> island with the Vienna boys choir, but, the bottom line is this: This
> earth
> can physically only support a certain population (what that number is, I
> don't know, I hear it has been raised over and over) before people starve
> and die.
> ***********
> Absolutely correct, and IIRC, that terminal population number [actually a
> reference to the point at which birth and death numbers match, but often
> touted as the max population of the earth] from about 25 years ago is 16 -
> 17 billion. I have never trusted such numbers as they suggest that people
> will behave in ways that people never will. My point is that we need to
> look at a lot of other things besides just 'too many people in the world.'
> If that is viewed as the problem then we [especially old men like me] are
> pretty much powerless to change things [we can still dream, but that is
> another thread...LOL]. It is not one big problem but a LOT of smaller
> ones.
> BillR
> Jacksonville FL
> 1981 300SD 265K / 200K engine [?]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________
> For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
> For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net
>



--
Gabriel Soto
Southern California
1987 300D 230K=-

Reply via email to