almost too far. If I am not able to get winblows to install, I have no issue with ubuntu on that machine. These are failed hackintosh boxes from white box systems or corporate toss away. AMD or intel, ubuntu does not care what the audio or video card is, what sort of usb or firewire, wifi or blue tooth. Only thing linux does not support is netflix. bluray or hdmi
On Jul 2, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Allan Streib wrote: > I have to say that Windows 7 has installed flawlessly whenever I've > tried it, which has only been a few times. It's the dozens of > update/reboot cycles post-install that are the pain. > > Ubuntu is a commercially-sponsored distribution has as a primary goal > the creation of an easy-to-use Linux desktop. From what I've heard (I > don't use it, myself) they have mostly succeeded. Some would say > they've gone too far. > > > > clay monroe <redgh...@comcast.net> writes: > >> I have found ubuntu to be far and away the easiest to install on >> multiple strange hardware. No idea why. Win7 is garbage unless you >> have piles of oem cd with drivers. Same with vista. Bound to be open >> source support for SSD. > > -- > 1983 300D > 1979 300SD > > _______________________________________ > http://www.okiebenz.com > For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com