On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:32:46 -0600 Peter Frederick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 220D is a bit slower and a bit less thirsty. The W123 will be > slower yet and more thirsty, although not by much. > > A good condition 220D with auto should get 32 mpg, about -- add a > couple for a stick (desirable, as the auto is SLOWWWWW!) My 220D typically got 28 mpg. Rarely above 30. Except for the one time from Sacramento, CA, to Portland, OR, where I cheated and coasted down hills (mountains, actually). That run was 36.6 mpg. Craig
