On Thu, 15 May 2014 11:28:43 -0400 Tim Crone <bb...@crone.us> wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Dan Penoff <d...@penoff.com> wrote: > > > One thing I failed to mention was the ability to use ZFS. I consider > > it superior when it comes to data integrity, and it's a lot more > > efficient than other formats from what I understand. One > > > I agree with ZFS if you can. Very CPU and RAM intensive, as I > understand it, but it is a good alternative to proprietary enterprise > storage.
>From the information I saw on the 'Net, making hashes of everything and then checking and rechecking them on read, it would be very CPU and RAM intensive. A fanless processor might make data access rather slow. > It sounds like a nice system, and the incremental acquisition model is a > good one. I am just moving my stuff to embedded where I can - I even > gave up ZFS for FAT32 because I'm too lazy to maintain another > computer. By the time I get home I'd rather work on the SDL if I have > free time. :) You mean after working on computers all day long, you don't want to continue to work on them at home, too? :-) Craig _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
