Peter wrote: > This is trash promulgated by a non-scientist with a right wing agenda. >
That is probably true. However, there are things that can be accomplished man-to-man against any of this bs - and that is the story that needs to be told, not some political non-science or science argument. Simply, we use too much junk and we can live quite will without so much junk. Forget about the usual semantics that gets nobody anywhere except for polarizing politics - let's get it together as people, look at each other as persons, treat each other with kindness, share with each other instead of pillaging anywhere and everywhere, do more with less. The usual NewEngland saw comes in handy - use it up, wear it out, make it do, or do without. We should be at the do without stage. ma _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
