Kinda like lipids and PSA? > -----Original Message----- > From: Mercedes [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of > Dan Penoff via Mercedes > Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 12:17 PM > To: Mercedes List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> > Cc: Dan Penoff <d...@penoff.com> > Subject: Re: [MBZ] Larry T Oil Analyses and Aircraft > > That was exactly my point. In the fleet and stationary duty engines I’ve > worked with, where oil sampling really pays off is with regular sampling at > fixed intervals and watching the trends. You can tell a great deal from an > oil > sample if you’ve got historical data. In fact, it’s kind of cool to look at a > sample history over several years, as it almost tells you exactly where the > engine is wearing (or not.) > > This is done with hydraulic systems as well. Just about anything fluid based > can benefit from analysis. > > Dan > > > On Feb 13, 2016, at 12:10 PM, G Mann via Mercedes > <mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > > > > To reap benefit, you first have to do a baseline analysis. then track > > particle increase or decrease from component wear trend, through > > successive samples. > > One sample by it's self, unless catastrophic failure has already > > started, has little value. > > > > > _______________________________________ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
_______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
