1. Apparently the prosecution conducted some forensic analysis on the recovered 
bullet as well as the pier concrete, and found evidence that the bullet that 
killed Kate had indeed ricocheted off the pier.

2. The weapon was a Sig P239, which is available in several calibers and 3 
flavors: DA/SA, DAO, and "DAK trigger system developed for law enforcement" I 
believe the DAK Sig is the one my son owns, a twin for his USCG duty weapon. It 
has a 6.5 lb. long trigger pull, hardly a hair-trigger which could be readily 
discharged by accident.

3. It is likely that as a federal LEO, the agent had authorization to carry 
either his issued duty weapon or a personally owned firearm. I have had 6 
different personally owned handguns over the years with written authorizations 
for on and off duty carry. I am sure none would have been allowed with a 
lighter than original trigger pull. The last was a DAO H&K. In recent decades 
the authorized weapons went to DA only to decrease the possibility of 
accidental discharge and subsequent liability. Thanks lawyers!

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: Mercedes [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of G Mann via 
Mercedes
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 12:18 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Cc: G Mann
Subject: Re: [MBZ] no Ingles

Interesting posit. Just where did you find this tidbit of fact. Since the 
Defense Lawyer made the claim "the gun had a hair trigger and he didn't intend 
to shoot her", but I find no information about a ricochet shot as being the 
killing wound.
Since the weapon was stolen from a police car, the likely owner was a 
policeman, No LEO's carry weapons with "hair triggers" because if there is a 
"shots fired" incident, the first claim by opposing lawyer representing the 
deceased criminal would be the cop used a weapon "reworked" to establish the 
cop is a "premeditated killer"... so NO police department armorer will set a 
trigger at less than 3 lb pull..

I do however find first person evidence by the young woman's' family members. 
who were with her at the murder, who stated the "alleged killer"
walked up to her and shot her, point blank.

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes < 
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:

> His shot ricocheted off a pier so he acted recklessly but didn't 
> intend to shoot her.
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Curley McLain via Mercedes < 
> mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
>
> > no
> >
> > This scumbag (the criminal, not the judge) is a career criminal.
> >
> > Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes <mailto:mercedes@okiebenz.com>
> >> December 1, 2017 at 10:24 AM
> >> Sort of like deranged American-born males going on a rampage, 
> >> shooting multiple victims?
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________
> > http://www.okiebenz.com
> >
> > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> >
> > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> >
> >
> _______________________________________
> http://www.okiebenz.com
>
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>
>
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to