I believe that the government is a force for evil that exists to enrich itself and is currently at war with the people on every level. I believe that education is a gimmick to give a lot of stupid people part time jobs with full time pay and has no objective beyond that, other than political indoctrinating the "students" to go along with the program.
I could go on further, but I feel i've said enough to qualify for tinfoil. I think you are a sucker and a fool and you think i'm flat nuts. what else is new? On Jan 8, 2008 10:16 PM, Wonko the Sane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hope you are correct. It will all depend on (1) the education ethic of > the > child and (2) the RULES set down by the ADULT in charge of the educational > process. > > Nothing different from public schools. The kids who want to learn will. > Those who aren't interested can't be beat into submission. > > As for the gubment corrupting the children ... send me your address so I > can > provide the raw materials for your tin foil hat. > > On Jan 8, 2008 8:53 PM, Gary Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i would be happy to have my kid take any standard government test and > > when she scores in the top few percentile, i would like them to just > > leave us the hell alone and quit wasting our time and robbing our > > spirit. way back in the day, you were finished being educated by the > > time you were 14 or 15 and if you actually knew something, you'd go to > > harvard or princeton till you were about 18. that was legitimate > > education. > > > > we now have 19 year olds who can barely read on a 4th grade level > > taking up space at a cost of 5 figures a year and tell people this > > somehow benefits the children. this is a lie. what would benefit the > > children is to let the smart ones finish high school at the age of 14 > > and let the dumb ones go work in the mines. the idea of of dumbing > > and slowing it down so the smart ones are locked up bored to tears > > until 18 so the dumb ones can actually follow it (which they won't > > because they are stupid and they don't care) benefits no one but the > > "educators" who get rich off this. > > > > NOTHING is to benefit the children. NOTHING is to benefit the poor. > > NOTHING is to benefit most of us. The government only benefits itself > > and only brings desolation to the citizenry. If we were a decent and > > intelligent society, we would demand they be dismantled, but we are > > stupid dupes who believe propaganda. at least in the old soviet > > union, no one over the age of 10 believed the nonsense they were fed > > by the government. I suppose the russians are just that much smarter > > than we are. > > > > On 1/8/08, Wonko the Sane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > At the risk of turning the conversation back to home schooling, one > must > > > understand why the government came up with this sort of "go to school" > > rule > > > in the first place. It was for the protection of the children, not as > > some > > > sort of evil government meddling. > > > > > > Where I grew up (West Virginia), it wasn't unusual -- not too many > years > > > before I was born in 1952 -- for kids to enter the coal mines at the > age > > of > > > 12, or even younger, and labor there for an entire lifetime. The > purpose > > of > > > the compulsory education law was to give these kids a chance at a > better > > > life. > > > > > > Although we'd hope that human nature would act differently, we have to > > > understand that there were fathers who'd put their kids into the mines > > at a > > > very early age, if only for the wages that would be brought home. Hey, > > if > > > Daddy didn't get much schooling then why do the sons need schooling? > > > > > > Fortunately, laws were passed and, at least at the time I was > graduated, > > a > > > child had to be in school until age 16. I think that might have been > > raised > > > to age 18. > > > > > > Now ... if you want to home school the kids *and* they will get a good > > > education, then I have no issues with that. The goal is an educated > > > individual. If a parent lays out a curriculum and sticks to it, the > > child > > > might get a superior education. > > > > > > As for those of you who are worried about the "gubmint" indoctrinating > a > > > child with socialist views in school, I must differ. I am *way* more > > worried > > > about the child be indoctrinated with way more dangerous philosophies, > > > mostly religious in nature. All three of my children went to public > > schools. > > > None are atheists. All three are pretty good citizens. My > step-daughter > > is > > > the "dummy" of the trio, having only a 3.6 GPA as a university junior. > > > > > > And before you think I have my head up my rear, I was *there* at BJU > > when > > > this home school movement was launched, and knew some of the folks who > > were > > > writing the curriculum. You worry about your child being perverted > > during > > > twelve years of public education? Just give them twelve years of > > > BJU-prepared stuff. > > > > > > I am a product of a sheltered Fundamentalist upbringing and am > slightly > > > screwed up as a result. > > > > > > Fortunately, I broke out (in my mid-20s) and am still a recovering > > > Fundamentalist. > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > On Jan 8, 2008 7:33 PM, Rich Thomas < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Great idea! Perhaps the presidential candidates will take this up > as > > a > > > > plank in their "law n' order" platform (I think Fred might already > be > > > > there!). It will bi-partisan support, who is the best one to make > > that > > > > change? > > > > > > > > --R (I'm for change and the best one to make it!) > > > > > > > > Tom Hargrave wrote: > > > > > Yah, right. At the same time why don't you pass a law making > > convenience > > > > > store robberies illegal? This way, no more convenience stores will > > be > > > > > robbed? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Tom Hargrave > > > > > www.kegkits.com > > > > > 256-656-1924 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________ > > > > http://www.okiebenz.com > > > > For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ > > > > For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > > > > http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > LT Don > > > http://don.homelinux.net/~don/ <http://don.homelinux.net/%7Edon/> < > http://don.homelinux.net/%7Edon/> > > > > > > apt-get update > > > apt-get upgrade > > > The following packages will be replaced > > > Prez > > > Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Y > > > _______________________________________ > > > http://www.okiebenz.com > > > For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ > > > For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > > > http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > > > > > > _______________________________________ > > http://www.okiebenz.com > > For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ > > For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > > http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > > > > > -- > LT Don > http://don.homelinux.net/~don/ <http://don.homelinux.net/%7Edon/> > > apt-get update > apt-get upgrade > The following packages will be replaced > Prez > Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Y > _______________________________________ > http://www.okiebenz.com > For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ > For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
