Acked by me. I didn't review the state tracker code, but at least I didn't notice anything wrong with the changes to the auxiliary modules, and I don't obecjt having this merged back in now that it is being actively maintained,
Jose ________________________________________ From: mesa-dev <mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> on behalf of Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> Sent: 14 November 2014 14:14 To: David Heidelberg; mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: emil.l.veli...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v3 0/9] Gallium Nine On 02/11/14 18:27, David Heidelberg wrote: > Hello everyone! > > First I'd like thank you for great feedback. > Sending third Gallium Nine merge request. We reduced number of commits > to necessary minimum. I hope all proposed changes are incorporated in v3. > > Thank you > Gents, Can we get an acked-by/reviewed-by for this ? Would be a shame to torture David to keep rebasing this for another three months. Afaics he's already applied to commit access with the sole perpose to maintain the state-tracker. Thanks Emil P.S. Patches 3 and 6 have minor comments to address. I don't mind if patch 6 is resolved after the merge. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.freedesktop.org_mailman_listinfo_mesa-2Ddev&d=AAIGaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=zfmBZnnVGHeYde45pMKNnVyzeaZbdIqVLprmZCM2zzE&m=eN-BbuqoGCTkisd-4qwlqZT03Gccr_3oPmVy9RTe370&s=n4htOYU6cyo0-OAtl4G2eksxLIwAxGWHvtK16W4TdRU&e= _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev