On 25/11/14 09:43, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
On 25/11/14 09:59, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 21.11.2014 23:57, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 17:09 +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 18.11.2014 17:43, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
For software drivers we worked with a trimmed set of piglit tests
(related to
format conversion), ~5700 tests selected with the following filter:
-t format -t color -t tex -t image -t swizzle -t clamp -t rgb -t lum
-t pix
-t fbo -t frame
Any particular reason for not testing at least piglit gpu.py with
llvmpipe? Last time I tried that a few months ago, it didn't take much
more than ten minutes on a quad-core A10-7850K.
gpu.py takes much more time on quad core i7-3610QM laptop with gallium
llvmpipe... After 6 hours waiting for piglit to finish, I started
killing the processes that took too much time.
I just tried it again with today's snapshots of LLVM SVN trunk and Mesa
Git master, it took about 22.5 minutes. Did you really test gpu.py
(which is a subset of quick.py), not all.py?
Yes, I tried with gpu.py but with an old llvm version. I will test again
with LLVM SVN trunk and last Mesa Git master.
Try the new "llvmpipe.py" test-list instead of gpu.py. It should skip
the problematic tests.
Jose
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
