On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 05:28 -0800, Christoph Bumiller wrote: > On 31.12.2009 12:05, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > Luca, > > > > This is an impressive body of work. I want to give Jose a chance to > > review the EGL/GLX extensions before pushing, but in the meantime I hope > > it's ok if I make a couple of quick suggestions/requests: > > > > Firstly, we're going to be evolving the TGSI instruction set a fair bit > > over the coming months to catch up with newer GLSL versions, CL, etc. > At that point I'd like to ask if, when all the nice memory spaces > are introduced to TGSI, these nasty indirect accesses to TEMP > will go away. > > They are really painful to implement because you cannot index > registers on nv50+ and thus we'd have to regard TEMP as memory. > And since there is no information in the TGSI tokens about > what TEMPs constitute an array, we'd have to store and load > all of them, which would be quite costly.
Yes, I think there will end up being some way in which we mark indexable ranges of temporaries. > So I was hoping that, optionally (older cards without actual memory > won't like it I suppose), the compiler can just generate the > appropriate stores and loads. I'm not sure about that. Can you be more explicit about what you're having trouble with? Keith ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
