-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2014.12.11 14.21, Sam Lanning wrote: > We've been thinking the goals of what we're trying to achieve with > deniability all wrong. > > Deniability is the goal of trying to make our use of encrypted > messaging not make us more liable for what we say any more than > messaging has already done for years. > > Deniability is *NOT* the introduction of a new property to our > online messaging that allows us to be able to deny what we've said > any more than we've been able to to in all our years previously > without end to end encryption. > > All deniability is, is putting safeguards in place so that our use > of cryptographically secure communications protocols does not screw > us over, and come with any more hidden surprises than any insecure > communications protocol.
Congratulations, this is the first statement about this that rises to the level of being coherent. E. - -- Ideas are my favorite toys. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF4EAREIAAYFAlSLBo8ACgkQQwkE2RkM0woOFQD/VDXw/g51jCXYB8OXPNIC7tlN woaONrKGx1rDok0l+yQA/iD1tVK14cvqKbbQfNxyXLE2ogfMqOxUyDo4P0hQFVc8 =k/oW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Messaging mailing list [email protected] https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
