On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Pushpalatha <[email protected]> wrote: > --- > conf/machine/imx6qnitrogen6w.conf | 18 + > .../support_nitrogen6x_config.patch | 27324 > +++++++++++++++++++ > recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fslc_2012.10.bb | 2 + > .../linux-imx-3.0.35/imx6qnitrogen6w/defconfig | 3020 ++ > .../support_for_nitrogen6_configuration.patch | 11469 ++++++++ > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx_3.0.35.bb | 3 + > 6 files changed, 41836 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 conf/machine/imx6qnitrogen6w.conf
This board should be included on meta-fsl-arm-extra. Could you, please, rebase your patches for that project? > create mode 100644 > recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fslc-v2012.10/imx6qnitrogen6w/support_nitrogen6x_config.patch Please, take a look https://github.com/Freescale/u-boot-imx This is where we get u-boot from. It´s a fork of mainline one (denx) plus some patches to include some patches that will be included on next u-boot version or some patches to configure something rellated with yocto (for example, scripts for inicialization). I think it´s better to include your board (nitrogen6w) patches on that repository instead for supporting those patches on the recipe. But, the main question here is: Does u-boot mainline support nitrogen6x/nitrogen6w? What´s the difference between nitrogen6x and nitrogen6w? May this board use nitrogen6x support someway? Otavio, could you, please, comment on this? I think it would only a matter of MACHINE_FEATURE. > create mode 100644 > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx-3.0.35/imx6qnitrogen6w/defconfig > create mode 100644 > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx-3.0.35/imx6qnitrogen6w/support_for_nitrogen6_configuration.patch The same is applicable to kernel. Apply patches in git repository and then update kernel recipe. Daiane _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
