Hi Otavio,
On 12/17/2012 05:59 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Daiane Angolini <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Pushpalatha
<[email protected]> wrote:
---
conf/machine/imx6qnitrogen6w.conf | 18 +
.../support_nitrogen6x_config.patch | 27324 +++++++++++++++++++
recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fslc_2012.10.bb | 2 +
.../linux-imx-3.0.35/imx6qnitrogen6w/defconfig | 3020 ++
.../support_for_nitrogen6_configuration.patch | 11469 ++++++++
recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx_3.0.35.bb | 3 +
6 files changed, 41836 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 conf/machine/imx6qnitrogen6w.conf
This board should be included on meta-fsl-arm-extra. Could you,
please, rebase your patches for that project?
In fact I think the board we have at meta-fsl-arm ought to work just
fine. I am unsure we need another board as I have added the wifi
firmware there too and Eric has tested it.
Confirmed. I built using machine type nitrogen6x and ran the result
on both SABRE Lite and Nitrogen6X.
Eric, can you comment on this?
create mode 100644
recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fslc-v2012.10/imx6qnitrogen6w/support_nitrogen6x_config.patch
Please, take a look https://github.com/Freescale/u-boot-imx
This is where we get u-boot from. It´s a fork of mainline one (denx)
plus some patches to include some patches that will be included on
next u-boot version or some patches to configure something rellated
with yocto (for example, scripts for inicialization).
I think it´s better to include your board (nitrogen6w) patches on that
repository instead for supporting those patches on the recipe.
But, the main question here is: Does u-boot mainline support
nitrogen6x/nitrogen6w?
Not yet. That's why I included u-boot-boundary recipe.
What´s the difference between nitrogen6x and nitrogen6w? May this
board use nitrogen6x support someway?
Otavio, could you, please, comment on this? I think it would only a
matter of MACHINE_FEATURE.
Yes, I think we can have it in same machine except if there're real
difference between them.
Except for the silk screen:
nitrogen6x == nitrogen6w
create mode 100644
recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx-3.0.35/imx6qnitrogen6w/defconfig
create mode 100644
recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx-3.0.35/imx6qnitrogen6w/support_for_nitrogen6_configuration.patch
The same is applicable to kernel. Apply patches in git repository and
then update kernel recipe.
I did not compare the patches but I think it should be the same we
have for sabrelite; in this case we can use overrides to avoid the
duplication (again, done in nitrogen6x board in extra repository).
Eric, please give us some light about the board difference?
Asked and answered.
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
