On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Daiane Angolini <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Pushpalatha > <[email protected]> wrote: >> --- >> conf/machine/imx6qnitrogen6w.conf | 18 + >> .../support_nitrogen6x_config.patch | 27324 >> +++++++++++++++++++ >> recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fslc_2012.10.bb | 2 + >> .../linux-imx-3.0.35/imx6qnitrogen6w/defconfig | 3020 ++ >> .../support_for_nitrogen6_configuration.patch | 11469 ++++++++ >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx_3.0.35.bb | 3 + >> 6 files changed, 41836 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 conf/machine/imx6qnitrogen6w.conf > > This board should be included on meta-fsl-arm-extra. Could you, > please, rebase your patches for that project?
In fact I think the board we have at meta-fsl-arm ought to work just fine. I am unsure we need another board as I have added the wifi firmware there too and Eric has tested it. Eric, can you comment on this? >> create mode 100644 >> recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fslc-v2012.10/imx6qnitrogen6w/support_nitrogen6x_config.patch > > Please, take a look https://github.com/Freescale/u-boot-imx > This is where we get u-boot from. It´s a fork of mainline one (denx) > plus some patches to include some patches that will be included on > next u-boot version or some patches to configure something rellated > with yocto (for example, scripts for inicialization). > > I think it´s better to include your board (nitrogen6w) patches on that > repository instead for supporting those patches on the recipe. > > But, the main question here is: Does u-boot mainline support > nitrogen6x/nitrogen6w? Not yet. That's why I included u-boot-boundary recipe. > What´s the difference between nitrogen6x and nitrogen6w? May this > board use nitrogen6x support someway? > > Otavio, could you, please, comment on this? I think it would only a > matter of MACHINE_FEATURE. Yes, I think we can have it in same machine except if there're real difference between them. >> create mode 100644 >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx-3.0.35/imx6qnitrogen6w/defconfig >> create mode 100644 >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx-3.0.35/imx6qnitrogen6w/support_for_nitrogen6_configuration.patch > > The same is applicable to kernel. Apply patches in git repository and > then update kernel recipe. I did not compare the patches but I think it should be the same we have for sabrelite; in this case we can use overrides to avoid the duplication (again, done in nitrogen6x board in extra repository). Eric, please give us some light about the board difference? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
