On Sunday 04 December 2005 10:50, Alon Altman wrote: > On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Shlomi Fish wrote: > > Check: > > > > http://welcome.linux.org.il/ > > > > Inspired by the latest discussions at meta, I decided to revampt the look > > of welcome.linux.org.il. Hopefully, everyone will like it better than the > > old design. > > > > It also now validates as XHTML 1.1. > > > > There may be still a few more issues to tackle, so if you don't like > > something, let me know, and I'll consider fixing it. > > I am happy to announce that the abomination is off from the web. The > original site at least didn't hurt the eyes and look like a high school > student's first website, save the <BLINK> tag. >
My site does not look *that* bad, and in my opinion the original site looked much less professional. Besides, that was really smart of you. I saw that you reverted it to the old one (don't ask me how - you did not update the repository), and by simply typing make upload (to see what happens) I reverted it back to my new version. Why don't we work on it together? We have several options: 1. Start from the new site, and gradually fix the standing problems in it. 2. Use the old style, by reverting the appropriate changeset where the new style was added in the repository, and then gradually work on a new site in a different branch and temporarily put it under http://welcome.linux.org.il/New-Site/ until everybody are happy with it. 3. Any other ideas? I think the markup of the new site being XHTML 1.1 and also more semantic in places, is superior to the old one. We can still use the old style with it. I should note that I've done some content changes there. Regards, Shlomi Fish --------------------------------------------------------------------- Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.shlomifish.org/ 95% of the programmers consider 95% of the code they did not write, in the bottom 5%.
