Still there is even better design (IMHO):
http://www.haifux.org/newcomers/test/
On 12/4/05, Shlomi Fish <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 04 December 2005 10:50, Alon Altman wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > Check:
> >
> > http://welcome.linux.org.il/
> >
> > Inspired by the latest discussions at meta, I decided to revampt the look
> > of welcome.linux.org.il. Hopefully, everyone will like it better than the
> > old design.
> >
> > It also now validates as XHTML 1.1.
> >
> > There may be still a few more issues to tackle, so if you don't like
> > something, let me know, and I'll consider fixing it.
>
> I am happy to announce that the abomination is off from the web. The
> original site at least didn't hurt the eyes and look like a high school
> student's first website, save the <BLINK> tag.
>
My site does not look *that* bad, and in my opinion the original site looked
much less professional.
Besides, that was really smart of you. I saw that you reverted it to the old
one (don't ask me how - you did not update the repository), and by simply
typing make upload (to see what happens) I reverted it back to my new
version.
Why don't we work on it together? We have several options:
1. Start from the new site, and gradually fix the standing problems in it.
2. Use the old style, by reverting the appropriate changeset where the new
style was added in the repository, and then gradually work on a new site in a
different branch and temporarily put it under
http://welcome.linux.org.il/New-Site/ until everybody are happy with it.
3. Any other ideas?
I think the markup of the new site being XHTML 1.1 and also more semantic in
places, is superior to the old one. We can still use the old style with it. I
should note that I've done some content changes there.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.shlomifish.org/
95% of the programmers consider 95% of the code they did not write, in the
bottom 5%.
--
Please visit the Wiki for w2l at:
http://www.hackers.org.il/mediawiki/index.php/W2l
--
Orr Dunkelman,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Any human thing supposed to be complete, must for that reason infallibly
be faulty" -- Herman Melville, Moby Dick.
Spammers: http://vipe.technion.ac.il/~orrd/spam.html
GPG fingerprint: C2D5 C6D6 9A24 9A95 C5B3 2023 6CAB 4A7C B73F D0AA
(This key will never sign Emails, only other PGP keys.)
