On Sat, 2003-07-12 at 20:04, J. Landman Gay wrote: > On 7/12/03 10:02 AM, Geoff Canyon wrote: > -- snip -- > > For those who prefer MC's simplicity, I don't see any harm in continuing > to assure it is compatible with the most current Rev engine. People will > still have to purchase Revolution to get full access to long scripts, so > RR won't lose any money by allowing folks a choice of IDEs. They have > already said they won't support alternate IDEs, so it won't cost them > anything.
And i wants to add that, because, some RR/MC apps needs to be build to run with no GUI at all (backgrounder or console-mode apps and demons), we needs to have a lightweight UI available to code, debug and maintain this kind of apps, for a best usage of the memory and the processor by the hosting servers. -- Bien cordialement, Pierre Sahores Serveurs d'applications & bases ACID SQL Penser et produire l'avantage compétitif _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard