Maybe Kevin will add a pref dialog that allows us to decide what palettes and menus we want to see in our work environment. That would help considerably and I don't see it as being that difficult to provide.
On Monday, July 21, 2003, at 09:10 AM, Robert Brenstein wrote:
On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 11:42 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
So putting it just as bluntly, that there is a perception of MC's value is
reason enough. If that perception changes over time the MC engine will
whither away naturally. There should be no need to force change, and doing
so would not have the liberating feeling of a choice.
I'm not proposing forcing anyone to switch. That's not even what I'm asking about. I'm specifically curious why people would expend significant effort updating/enhancing the MC environment. If all we're talking about is maintaining compatibility with new engines, then that's a minimal task and I don't see any reason not to.
Well, I for one have just renewed MC licence, so I am "stuck" so do speak with MC for another year. Not that I despair. I am happy with MC, and I see no need for fork out a few hundred bucks to switch to Rev any time soon. I am among those for whom Rev's interface is too rich and gets in my way.
Robert _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
Sincerely, Simon
_______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
