I just read the current draft and I must say that it's really good!! It's very clear and I like the new standard too. It shows that the metalink format has been around for some time. Lots of improvements!
Just a few comments on small things: Somewhere it says: metalink:metalink elements MAY contain exactly one metalink:origin element. If metalink:type is "dynamic", metalink:metalink elements MAY contain exactly one metalink:origin element. Looks like an unnecessary repetition. The same for metalink:updated a few lines down. metalink:resources element MUST contain at least one metalink:url element, but couldn't it be useful with a metalink that only contains metalink:metadata tags (and no urls)? Great work! Hampus Wessman Anthony Bryan wrote: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bryan-metalink-04.txt > > A new version of I-D, draft-bryan-metalink-04.txt has been successfuly > submitted by Anthony Bryan and posted to the IETF repository. > > Filename: draft-bryan-metalink > Revision: 04 > Title: The Metalink Download Description Format > Creation_date: 2008-12-31 > WG ID: Independent Submission > Number_of_pages: 36 > > Abstract: > This document specifies Metalink Documents, an XML-based download > description format. > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metalink Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/metalink-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
