thanks for the review! you caught some good things!

I changed it to:

   o  metalink:resources element MUST contain at least one metalink:
      metadata element or at least one metalink:url element.  Typically,
      metalink:resources element contains more than one metalink:url
      element to provide multiple download sources.

is that ok, or is there a better way to word it?

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Hampus Wessman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I just read the current draft and I must say that it's really good!!
> It's very clear and I like the new standard too. It shows that the
> metalink format has been around for some time. Lots of improvements!
>
> Just a few comments on small things:
>
> Somewhere it says:
>  metalink:metalink elements MAY contain exactly one metalink:origin
>  element.  If metalink:type is "dynamic", metalink:metalink
>  elements MAY contain exactly one metalink:origin element.
> Looks like an unnecessary repetition. The same for metalink:updated a
> few lines down.
>
> metalink:resources element MUST contain at least one metalink:url
> element, but couldn't it be useful with a metalink that only contains
> metalink:metadata tags (and no urls)?
>
> Great work!
> Hampus Wessman
>
>
> Anthony Bryan wrote:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bryan-metalink-04.txt
>>
>> A new version of I-D, draft-bryan-metalink-04.txt has been successfuly
>> submitted by Anthony Bryan and posted to the IETF repository.
>>
>> Filename:        draft-bryan-metalink
>> Revision:        04
>> Title:           The Metalink Download Description Format
>> Creation_date:   2008-12-31
>> WG ID:           Independent Submission
>> Number_of_pages: 36
>>
>> Abstract:
>> This document specifies Metalink Documents, an XML-based download
>> description format.
>>
>>
>
>
> >
>



-- 
(( Anthony Bryan ... Metalink [ http://www.metalinker.org ]
  )) Easier, More Reliable, Self Healing Downloads

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metalink Discussion" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/metalink-discussion?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to