I don't think there was ever any glacier activity there:) Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 30, 2013, at 7:03 AM, Anne Black <impact...@aol.com> wrote: > Jim wrote: > > Any Phd's out there want to explain the statistics of so many falls in > such a small area??? What...a .01% chance! > > OR could they have been pushed there and accumulated by the latest > glaciations(s)?????? > > > Anne M. Black > www.IMPACTIKA.com > impact...@aol.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Wooddell <jimwoodd...@gmail.com> > To: Erik Fisler <phxe...@yahoo.com> > Cc: Meteorite List <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> > Sent: Mon, Apr 29, 2013 1:40 pm > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Franconia AREA (was, Re: ...terminology...) > > > Hi Erik and all! > > What mapped strewnfield? The decade old one that was used for the > study or a current one that extended the Franconia Area strewn field > about 4 miles that was not used? > > Any Phd's out there want to explain the statistics of so many falls in > such a small area??? What...a .01% chance! > > Jim > > > > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Erik Fisler <phxe...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> You mean all those H3-5's are paired?!? Lord. >> >> I think people forget that there are LL's, L's and H's found from the > Gold > Basin fall. To say that a mass from a parent body large enough to have a > strewn > field of this size and TKW should be one homogeneous petro.-type is silly. >> This business of trying to classify every stone as a different fall > for what > ever selfish or perverse reason along with having a personal attachment to the > outcome of the over all conclusion is ridiculous and completely against the > scientific method. >> >> How many of those YDCA or what ever H3-5's have been found outside > the mapped > strewn field? And how far? >> >> -Erik Fisler >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Apr 26, 2013, at 11:02 PM, Robert Verish <bolidecha...@yahoo.com> > wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> Just read another article in the 2013 March edition of M&PS, >>> "Stones from Mohave County, Arizona: >>> Multiple falls in the 'Franconia strewn field' " >>> by Melinda Hutson, et al. >>> >>> There is much to digest from this 5-author paper that is 25 pages > long. >>> What with 14 stones being studied and 7 pairings to be described, > there is a > lot to chew on. >>> >>> Here's something to chew on. According to this paper, "Much > unclassified > material that has been distributed [sold] as 'Franconia' may not be from the > Franconia fall". The authors make a case that more than half of the finds > made > in the "Franconia area" are paired to the Buck Mountain Wash fall. >>> >>> It has taken 10 years, but these findings show that I was justified > in my > belly-aching about all of the self-pairing that was occurring back then. It > was on this very List that I was strongly criticized for this, and many > dealers > that thought they knew better defended their God-given right to name their > stones after the Franconia meteorite that I got classified. A closer look at > the MetBull images for Franconia shows that very few of them are from the > Franconia fall. I offer no apologies for taking great satisfaction in the fact > that I am now vindicated. >>> >>> The paper goes on to show that every Sacramento Wash numbered > meteorite is > paired to Buck Mountain Wash, which effectively has resulted in the demise of > the SaW DCA and hastened the formation of the Yucca DCA. >>> >>> As I said, if you read this paper, there's a lot more to digest. >>> It's late and I'm thinking about chewing on an antacid pill. >>> >>> -- Bob V. >>> >>> --- On Thu, 4/25/13, Jim Wooddell <jimwoodd...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> From: Jim Wooddell <jimwoodd...@gmail.com> >>>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk - IMB or SMB? The > nomenclature of > Melts. >>>> To: "Meteorite List" <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> >>>> Date: Thursday, April 25, 2013, 5:29 PM >>>> Hi All! >>>> Just a point of information. I just read Dr. Rubin's paper, >>>> "Multiple melting in a four-layered barred-olivine chondrule with >>>> compositionally heterogeneous glass from LL3.0 Semarkona" >>>> Whew! That's a title for a paper! >>>> While we are on the subject of melts, I thought I'd point-out >>>> this paper. >>>> Enjoyed reading it the first time....actually understood some >>>> of it and will read it once again after thinking about it >>>> for a while. >>>> You folks might enjoy reading it when you get a chance! >>>> Thanks Alan!! >>>> >>>> Jim Wooddell >>> ++++++++++++++ >>> >>> ______________________________________________ >>> >>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com >>> Meteorite-list mailing list >>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com >>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >> ______________________________________________ >> >> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > > -- > Jim Wooddell > jimwoodd...@gmail.com > 928-247-2675 > ______________________________________________ > > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > ______________________________________________ > > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
