I was not sure if the discuss list was the best place to send the "spread the semantic web" message (thanks Chris, for suggesting this).
So is this the best place for pure marketing messages? Or is this frowned upon? Best, Alex On 10/14/06, Bob Jonkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about microformats-new , along with an open microformats-dev, and keep microformats- discuss for existing, established microformats. microformats-dev could mean "the development of new microformats"; perhaps microformats-applications would be a better name... --Bob. This is what Tantek Çelik <microformats-discuss@microformats.org> said about "Re: [uf-discuss] Idea: beginners/ge" on 14 Oct 2006 at 12:25 > In the spirit of simplest solution first, why not start with just *one* new > list for new microformats? > > I think "propose" is too limiting because there is a lot more involved in > the development of new microformats than just proposals (in fact, the more > important parts are *not* the proposal). > > I like the suggestions of opening up microformats-dev as well. > > Anybody else on the list have thoughts? > > Thanks, > > Tantek > _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
_______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
