On 6/28/07 5:28 PM, "Alex Faaborg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Probably none of us here is the right ones to decide something like >> this... > > Fair enough, several other people have made this point as well. We > are always open to feedback about microformat detection in Firefox 3, > so if anyone has any comments, please feel free to post them to this > list or email me directly. > >> FF3 perhaps shouldn't call it something > > The menu which contacts, addresses and locations are listed under > will need some form of name. Also, journalists will probably want a > feature name in press briefings and when they make product comparison > tables, etc. We aren't likely to call it SuperHyperMetaMagic, but we > are going to need to call it something. Perhaps that is right way to capture this issue then, as a *user-interface* issue. Alex, go ahead and add a description and labeling of this issue to: http://microformats.org/wiki/user-interface along with the evidence/needs you cited (e.g. number/source of journalists that have requested a name for microformats features in order to talk about them). >> Everybody can choose their own name and it will - by the power of >> web 2.0 which microformat is very much a part of - become a good >> word in the end. > > Mozilla's user experience team is going to continue brainstorming the > best way to expose microformat detection to end users, along with the > rest of the mozilla community. I'll post updates to this list from > time to time, and it will be interesting to see what interfaces and > names other people come up with as well. I'd definitely suggest adding thoughts and ideas to the 'user-interface' page on the microformats wiki so that these issues (and brainstorms) raised here on the list aren't lost to the pile of email. Thanks, Tantek _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss