I think it’s an LSA flooding issue, especially since it works for a while then stops, then comes back. Disabling the instance as you do to fix it makes the whole adjacency start over which starts with new LSAs. Using a “broadcast” network type doesn’t use broadcasts to establish the adjacencies, it still uses multicast. It just allows for the election of the DR/BDR and more than two endpoints compared to Point-to-point network type. Anyway, it’s not the issue. Have you tried disabling (or enabling if it’s currently disabled) Multicast Enhancement on the two UBNT links? Is there a switch between the two UBNT links in the middle?
Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 30, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users > <mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: > > In your case did you use a "hidden non used" /30 to build the eoip and then > put your good IPs on top of the eoip? > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Adam R Johnson <ajohn...@thewisp.net> wrote: >> Ours was/is a /29. >> >> >> >> ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT >> (815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net >> PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283 >> WWW.THEWISP.NET | >> >> >> >>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:36 AM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users >>> <mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: >>> Between the two routers it's a /30 >>> >>> Interesting thing to note...it came back up on its own over lunch. About >>> 11 hours of it not working (see the log previously posted). >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Robert Andrews via Mikrotik-users >>>> <mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: >>>> So this brings up a question that we ran into, what are the netmasks >>>> around these links? >>>> >>>> On 10/30/2018 10:14 AM, Adam R Johnson via Mikrotik-users wrote: >>>> > Hey Josh, >>>> > >>>> > Just throwing in my 2 cents here. We have a very similar situation. What >>>> > was once a powercode bmu, is now a rb3011 connected to an AF24<>AF24 >>>> > then another rb3011. The 3011s will not complete adjacency, where the >>>> > bmu and 3011 did originally. Our OSPF setup is PtP in these scenarios. >>>> > We have this setup in 2 separate locations on our network, and each has >>>> > the same problem. Our 'stab in the dark' fix was adding a secondary and >>>> > temporary 192.168.x.x/24 on the segment, and it created adjacency and >>>> > ran without error. We did the same for the second instance with the same >>>> > result. >>>> > >>>> > We revisited the issue, to try to resolve a week or so later, but was >>>> > unable to find the cause or solution in the time we had. Given that it >>>> > was working without error, albeit slightly messy, we have left it in >>>> > place with more important things to tackle. It has been like this for >>>> > about 8 months now. >>>> > >>>> > Im not necessarily advocating this as a fix, but it is a workaround that >>>> > may provide further information to lead to the issues cause, and imho is >>>> > a bit nicer than an EoIP tunnel. >>>> > >>>> > Cheers! >>>> > >>>> > *ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT* >>>> > (815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net <mailto:ajohn...@thewisp.net> >>>> > PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283 >>>> > *WWW.THEWISP.NET | * >>>> > <http://www.thewisp.net/><http://www.facebook.com/thewispnet> >>>> > <http://www.twitter.com/thewispnet> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 8:37 AM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users >>>> > <mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > CCR goes through two Ubnt wireless links before hitting the RB750. >>>> > >>>> > On the CCR1009 it is ether4 - not a combo port, not switched. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Josh Luthman >>>> > Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> > Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> > 1100 Wayne St >>>> > Suite 1337 >>>> > Troy, OH 45373 >>>> > >>>> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Scott <lamb...@lambertfam.org >>>> > <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > On 2018/10/30 09:24, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>> > >>>> > There are two Ubnt backhauls between them. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > With recent firmware it shouldn't be a big deal to run >>>> > broadcast. I always run Point-to-point over wireless links with >>>> > exactly two endpoints. A lot of that is leftover from when most >>>> > 802.11 based wireless links had issues with broadcast. >>>> > >>>> > What connects the two backhauls? Crossover cable? Switch, >>>> > smart or dumb, brand? >>>> > >>>> > Which interface are you using on the 1009? Is it a combo port? >>>> > Is it in the switch group? >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix >>>> > SysAdmin >>>> > lamb...@lambertfam.org <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Mikrotik-users mailing list >>>> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org> >>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Mikrotik-users mailing list >>>> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list >>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mikrotik-users mailing list >>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik-users mailing list > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
_______________________________________________ Mikrotik-users mailing list Mikrotik-users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
