Is there enough separation between the two polarities to run both on the same frequency?
I'm looking to replace a 10mbps orthogon with a higher capacity link without having to pay to price for a license upgrade on the orthogon. I'd like to not use any more of the band than I am already using. --- Aaron, MCP, Network+, A+ Network Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Great Lakes Internet, Inc 112 N. Howard Croswell, MI 48422 (810) 679-3395 MI Toll-Free (877) 558-8324 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 9:06 PM To: Mikrotik discussions Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] nstreme dual Both of my links are using dual polarity dishes. Horizontal and Vertical on one big fat happy antenna =) If you're just trying to figure out which to use I highly advise OSPF. If you're #1 concern is bandwidth (and you're forced to MikroTik) then go dual nstreme. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly. --- Henry Spencer On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Keith Barber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I never thought about using two wds links on the same dish. > I wonder how much you would gain in this configuration over dual nstreme? > As the nstreme requires quite a bit of horsepower once you start pushing a > lot of traffic through the link. > > -Keith- > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Kevin Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wed, 10/22/2008 6:58pm > To: 'Mikrotik discussions' <mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com> > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] nstreme dual > > Two separate boards. Right now we have an x86 Mikrotik router on both > ends, > one of the links is using RB532's and the other is actually a Redline. > This > is a 24 mile link and we are needing more capacity. At the moment with the > limited tower space we're going to be installing some dual polarity > feedhorns in the PacWireless 2' antennas and then having three links > between > the sites. > > -Kevin Neal > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Cosby > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 4:36 PM > To: Mikrotik discussions > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] nstreme dual > > All on one board, or using two separate boards? > > Kevin Neal wrote: > > We've been using equal cost OSPF routes, there's no redundancy with > > Nstreme Dual. > > > > -Kevin Neal > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Cosby > > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 4:29 PM > > To: MikroTik@mail.butchevans.com > > Subject: [Mikrotik] nstreme dual > > > > Anyone using this successfully in 5.x frequencies? What boards, > > cards, antennas, etc? > > > > > > > > -- > Randy Cosby > Vice President > InfoWest, Inc > > office: 435-773-6071 > > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20081022/c865fe 7f/attachment.html _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
