Sry, arp. Im in the car ;)

-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 6:30 PM
To: Mikrotik discussions <mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com>
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question

Static nat or static ARP?

Static ARP is /ip arp

On 5/4/09, David Smith <david.sm...@preferredtechnology.com> wrote:
> Got it. I was looking at setting up a pinger of some sort to keep it
> refreshed. How can i add static nat?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 6:15 PM
> To: Mikrotik discussions <mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com>
> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question
>
> Yep - /tool netwatch
>
> Pretty self explanatory, but simply put:
>
> You give it an IP (not host name =(, error timeout and duration and it pings
> that IP every duration and if the response is greater then the timeout it is
> a failed ping.
>
> It's a lot like an automated fping if you know what that is.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> "When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
> improbable, must be the truth."
> --- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
>
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:11 PM, David Smith <
> david.sm...@preferredtechnology.com> wrote:
>
>> Netwatch?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 6:06 PM
>> To: Mikrotik discussions <mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question
>>
>> Looks like you are right:
>> *station-pseudobridge* - wireless station that can be put in bridge. MAC
>> NAT
>> is performed on all traffic sent over the wireless interface, so that it
>> look like coming from the station's MAC address regardless of the actual
>> sender (the standard does not allow station to send packets with different
>> MAC address from its own). Reverse translation (when replies arrive from
>> the
>> AP to the pseudobridge station) is based on the ARP table. Non-IP
>> protocols
>> are being sent to the default MAC address (the last MAC address, which the
>> station has received a non-IP packet from). That means that if there is
>> more
>> than one client that uses non-IP protocols (for example, PPPoE) behind the
>> station, none of them will be able to work correctly
>>
>> Still, you should not have problems with ARP with good links to your
>> stations on wlan2.  If you really care about it add netwatch to the rb433
>> to
>> them every 2 minutes.  This will leave the MACs in the ARP table.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> "When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
>> improbable, must be the truth."
>> --- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:50 PM, David Smith <
>> david.sm...@preferredtechnology.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Yes, but the pseudobridge only presents ONE MAC address to the network
>> site
>> > - it's own. The pseudo then answers as a proxy for any MAC addresses
>> behind
>> > it (the ones in its table). What happens when these entries time out?
>> > WDS would be the switch equivalent, not pseudo.
>> > I cant implement WDS.
>> > ds
>> >
>> > David Smith
>> >
>> > Preferred Technology Solutions
>> > 212 West Spring Valley Rd
>> > Richardson, TX  75081
>> > Office: 972-331-5610
>> > Cell: 972-898-2626
>> > Fax: 972-644-4911
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com [mailto:
>> > mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
>> > Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 5:47 PM
>> > To: Mikrotik discussions
>> > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question
>> >
>> > Bridging is more like a switch.  Not sure what you mean by NAT for
>> MACs...
>> >
>> > The bridge will learn MACs and, like a switch versus a hub, it will only
>> > send the traffic to the port of which the MAC answered from.
>> >
>> > The MAC table (normally called the ARP table) in every device but Cisco
>> (to
>> > my knowledge) will clear out after 2 minutes or if it answered twice
>> within
>> > that timeout will clear after 10 minutes.
>> >
>> > Josh Luthman
>> > Office: 937-552-2340
>> > Direct: 937-552-2343
>> > 1100 Wayne St
>> > Suite 1337
>> > Troy, OH 45373
>> >
>> > "When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
>> > improbable, must be the truth."
>> > --- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:42 PM, David Smith <
>> > david.sm...@preferredtechnology.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I am just learning that this may be an issue, so bear with me.
>> > > My understanding of pseudobridge is that it is basically a NAT for MAC
>> > > addresses.
>> > > So, the pseudobridge MAC NAT table would only be populated with MAC
>> > > addresses from devices behind the pseudobridge that had initiated some
>> > sort
>> > > of traffic that went out the bridge.
>> > > If that is the case, then would not the MAC NAT "table" time out, or
>> then
>> > > entries expire after a period of time? BTW, what is the default time,
>> and
>> > > how to populate the table with static entries?
>> > > Thanks for your patience,
>> > >
>> > > David Smith
>> > >
>> > > Preferred Technology Solutions
>> > > 212 West Spring Valley Rd
>> > > Richardson, TX  75081
>> > > Office: 972-331-5610
>> > > Cell: 972-898-2626
>> > > Fax: 972-644-4911
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com [mailto:
>> > > mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
>> > > Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 5:35 PM
>> > > To: Mikrotik discussions
>> > > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question
>> > >
>> > > Shouldn't have a problem...if you're really concerned you can put the
>> > MACs
>> > > in staticly but if you have a delay in ARP resolution then you have a
>> > poor
>> > > link.
>> > >
>> > > Josh Luthman
>> > > Office: 937-552-2340
>> > > Direct: 937-552-2343
>> > > 1100 Wayne St
>> > > Suite 1337
>> > > Troy, OH 45373
>> > >
>> > > "When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
>> > > improbable, must be the truth."
>> > > --- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:32 PM, David Smith <
>> > > david.sm...@preferredtechnology.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I have a rb433 with (2) 52 radios.
>> > > >
>> > > > One radio (WLAN1) is 802.11a and connects to an ap which is
>> > > > connected
>> > to
>> > > > the default gateway.
>> > > >
>> > > > The other radio (WLAN2) is 802.11bg and allows client access with 1
>> > > > SSID.
>> > > >
>> > > > WLAN 1 is Station pseudobridge, and WLAN2 is ap-bridge.
>> > > >
>> > > > On the WLAN2 side, the clients consist of 802.11bg to serial
>> > > > terminal
>> > > > servers (up to 5 of them associated). (These are the same as serial
>> to
>> > > > Ethernet, just wifi enabled.)They all have static IP address on the
>> > same
>> > > > subnet as the rest of the network, as is the default gateway.
>> > > >
>> > > > These devices are polled via IP address ONCE every hour from a
>> > > > remote
>> > > > site using a VPN connection to the default gateway.
>> > > >
>> > > > So, using pseudobridge, will I have an issue polling the devices
>> behind
>> > > > the 802.11bg radio since traffic is initiated only on the default
>> > > > gateway side?
>> > > >
>> > > > Will the arp table entries on pseudobridge expire is my concern.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks!
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > David Smith
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Preferred Technology Solutions
>> > > > 212 West Spring Valley Rd
>> > > > Richardson, TX  75081
>> > > > Office: 972-331-5610
>> > > > Cell: 972-898-2626
>> > > > Fax: 972-644-4911
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > -------------- next part --------------
>> > > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> > > > URL: <
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20090504/d668ee30/attachment.html
>> > > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > Mikrotik mailing list
>> > > > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
>> > > > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>> > > >
>> > > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>> > > > RouterOS
>> > > >
>> > > -------------- next part --------------
>> > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> > > URL: <
>> > >
>> >
>> http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20090504/7fa6360f/attachment.html
>> > > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Mikrotik mailing list
>> > > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
>> > > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>> > >
>> > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>> > > RouterOS
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Mikrotik mailing list
>> > > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
>> > > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>> > >
>> > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>> > > RouterOS
>> > >
>> > -------------- next part --------------
>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> > URL: <
>> >
>> http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20090504/c9df78f5/attachment.html
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Mikrotik mailing list
>> > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
>> > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>> >
>> > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>> > RouterOS
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Mikrotik mailing list
>> > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
>> > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>> >
>> > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>> > RouterOS
>> >
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20090504/61da9cfd/attachment.html
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mikrotik mailing list
>> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>
>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>> RouterOS
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mikrotik mailing list
>> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>
>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>> RouterOS
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20090504/0dd9ff50/attachment.html>
> _______________________________________________
> Mikrotik mailing list
> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>
> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
> _______________________________________________
> Mikrotik mailing list
> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>
> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
>


-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth."
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik

Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik

Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS

Reply via email to