David F. Skoll wrote:
> If anyone doesn't think SpamAssassin is an evil piece of code,
> _set_macro_LOCALSTATEDIR should remove all remaining doubts.
> 
> If/when I find a general-purpose way to detect what the [EMAIL PROTECTED]&$&#$
> LOCAL_STATE_DIR should be set to for a given SpamAssassin
> installation, I will patch MIMEDefang to use it.

Calling spamc avoids many issues with the Perl APIs.
http://www.mimedefang.com/kwiki/index.cgi?SpamassassinSpamcSpamd

I think the added stability across version upgrades would be worth a slight 
performance hit.  But depending on your setup, overall performance might 
actually improve... making it a win/win scenario.

-- 
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com               805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com       Software Engineer

_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang

Reply via email to