David F. Skoll wrote: > If anyone doesn't think SpamAssassin is an evil piece of code, > _set_macro_LOCALSTATEDIR should remove all remaining doubts. > > If/when I find a general-purpose way to detect what the [EMAIL PROTECTED]&$&#$ > LOCAL_STATE_DIR should be set to for a given SpamAssassin > installation, I will patch MIMEDefang to use it.
Calling spamc avoids many issues with the Perl APIs. http://www.mimedefang.com/kwiki/index.cgi?SpamassassinSpamcSpamd I think the added stability across version upgrades would be worth a slight performance hit. But depending on your setup, overall performance might actually improve... making it a win/win scenario. -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902 Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang