On 1/16/07, David F. Skoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1) Disk I/O: MIMEDefang will use less disk I/O than Mailscanner because you're not queueing every mail message twice. In fact, if you have a modern version of Sendmail with SuperSafe set to PostMilter and MIMEDefang rejects or tempfails a message, that queue file won't be sync'd to disk.
Sorry for going OT, but this is the first I'd heard of the PostMilter option. Is there any reason not to enable that with MIMEDefang? (Even if the server crashes before the queue is sync'd, the sender will retry, so no data loss should occur, correct?) Josh Kelley _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
