2013/9/14 Jon: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ruben Van Boxem >> I think you guys are missing the main problem: the fact that for the last >> half year, trunk was necessary to build the latest GCC version. I'm >> confident the whole trunk stability question will descend into only murmurs >> if a stable version can be guaranteed that can be used to build GCC. This is >> I think the main reason a lot of people are complaining. This should be very >> much avoided in the future IMHO. >> >> Just my 2c, >> >> Ruben > > i'd like to hear nixman and alexey's perspective as it relates to the > mingw-builds binaries.
I agree that using trunk to build a stable toolchain - it's a bad idea. Such a method should be burried. Also, I think, before releasing mingw-w64, we should release a toolchain on the basis of the current trunk, for testing. And, on the basis of the feedback on this build, we should be decided what to do next... -- Regards, niXman ___________________________________________________ Dual-target(32 & 64-bit) MinGW compilers for 32 and 64-bit Windows: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingwbuilds/ ___________________________________________________ Another online IDE: http://liveworkspace.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99! 1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
